News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Hackers Steal Michael Jackson's Unreleased Tracks by noonespecial on Sunday March 04, 2012 @11:24PM (#3665405)
Hard to feel much sympathy for Sony. Feels like two different kinds of vultures both picking at the carcass.

I always thought that when the author/artist dies, copyright should terminate. There is obviously no longer incentive to produce and what happens after is always so undignified.

Re:Hackers Steal Michael Jackson's Unreleased Tracks by nekojima on Sunday March 04, 2012 @11:27PM (#3665415)
What about co-writers, other musicians, producers and so on that create the work who live on after one of their cohort dies?

I've always felt that ten years was suitable for copyright fee recovery and then let it be in the public domain.

Re:Hackers Steal Michael Jackson's Unreleased Tracks by noonespecial on Sunday March 04, 2012 @11:31PM (#3665425)
Limitation of terms to a sane time-frame is important as well but it seems like a different fight.

I just think its a shame that Jackson is going to get Mickey Moused for an entire human lifespan before having a chance at public domain. Buy it now before it goes back in the Neverland vault for good! (We mean it this time...)

Re:Hackers Steal Michael Jackson's Unreleased Tracks by nekojima on Sunday March 04, 2012 @11:36PM (#3665437)
"before it goes back in the Neverland vault for good!"

I sincerely wish that was an option I could choose!!

Re:Hackers Steal Michael Jackson's Unreleased Tracks by Tycho on Monday March 05, 2012 @04:52AM (#3666029)
The copyright should always have a minumum term regardless of whether the artist is alive or not because the publishers need some guarantee for their investment. It would probably also create an incentive for rival publishers to supply drugs and boos to artists until they accidentally overdose.