Re:Farmer ordered to pay >$92K after confusion over meaning ...
by s1artibartfast on Saturday July 08, 2023 @03:11PM
(#36647703)
And some of those contract terms can be more or less favorable to one party than what a could would decide in the absence of an explicit contract stating otherwise.
Re:Farmer ordered to pay >$92K after confusion over meaning ...
by Ferret7446 on Sunday July 09, 2023 @01:34AM
(#36651858)
So basically they prefer "signing" to contracts that are poorly specified and where any disagreement (significantly moreso than a well specified contract) results in a lengthy and expensive legal process for both parties. Which is fine as long as they know what they're getting into.
So it may not be relevant for this case, but in general buying and selling without a contract saves you from having to pore through legal details.