News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fedora considers “privacy-preserving” telemetry by dschuetz on Friday July 07, 2023 @11:05AM (#36632829)
I get your point, I really do. And it got me thinking. I suppose, you're right concerning bugs and safety aspects. But, usage pattern collection is a huge problem, not only privacy-wise. This is what I do not understand:

Why are there code paths nobody uses, that have to be maintained, in the first place?

Re:Fedora considers “privacy-preserving” telemetry by carry_bit on Friday July 07, 2023 @11:23AM (#36633115)
Unused code paths were once used or it was thought that they would be used. If you don't know if something is used, it's safest to assume it is being used or is there for some reason (Chesterton's Fence). If it's being used, you need to maintain it lest there be a regression.
Re:Fedora considers “privacy-preserving” telemetry by techwizrd on Friday July 07, 2023 @02:12PM (#36635946)
For example, let's say we implement support for a web standard or vendor prefix. We can mark it as deprecated.

But how do we know the code path is no longer in use? Are people still using this CSS property (e.g., a vendor prefix)? Are people still using gopher or this one configuration variable? The more configuration options you have, the more combinations you need to test and maintain.