News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on GPT-4 API General Availability. Parent comment

Re:GPT-4 API General Availability by ignoramous on Friday July 07, 2023 @01:53AM (#36627737)
> Couldn’t someone say prototype the entire product on some lower-quality LLM and occasionally pass requests to GPT4 to validate behavior?

This, infact, might be a better way to do inference anyway: https://twitter.com/Francis_YAO_/status/1675967988925710338

> So, to return to the point, can’t people just build their product with openAI or other and plan to move away based on the cost and fit for their circumstances?

Depends. There are signs that folks are buying into GPT-specific APIs (like function calls) which may not be as easy to migrate away from.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GPT-4 API General Availability by bredren on Sunday July 09, 2023 @05:11PM (#36658937)
Asking because I have not implemented these yet: is there anything unique about the syntax that it can't just be copied?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GPT-4 API General Availability by ignoramous on Monday July 10, 2023 @12:12PM (#36668418)
Some (not all) projects are indeed "copying" the OpenAI APIs; ex: https://github.com/go-skynet/LocalAI/issues/588
[ Parent | on HN ]