News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on G/O Media Incorporating AI-Generated Content. Parent comment

Re:G/O Media Incorporating AI-Generated Content by klausa on Thursday July 06, 2023 @11:15AM (#36617307)
Does reliable detection matter?

I think platform holders saying "AI content is unwelcome here", and loudly kicking off violators is more than enough to send the required signal.

The goal is not to have 0% generated content, it's to brand yourself as _the_ source for thoughtful, human writing. Having an occasional article slip under the radar is fine.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:G/O Media Incorporating AI-Generated Content by 13years on Thursday July 06, 2023 @11:28AM (#36617529)
When you put a lot of effort into your own creation and then it is rejected because it is flagged as AI, then yes it will matter significantly. 50% of my own art I created is flagged as AI.

There may be an appeal process, but the point is AI will make verification of authenticity painful.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:G/O Media Incorporating AI-Generated Content by klausa on Thursday July 06, 2023 @11:36AM (#36617635)
You're misunderstanding what I'm saying.

My argument isn't "imperfect detection is fine".

I'm saying that _you don't need detection at all_.

Just make it very clear that AI content is unwelcome on your platform and loudly boot everyone who tries to "experiment" with your limits.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:G/O Media Incorporating AI-Generated Content by 13years on Thursday July 06, 2023 @11:58AM (#36617994)
Yes, that is really the only thing that you can do. Set expectations and reasonable heuristics.
[ Parent | on HN ]