Re:Judge rules White House pressured social networks to “sup...
by dporter on Thursday July 06, 2023 @09:33AM
(#36615508)
It stands for “The Former Guy.” Some people won’t say Trump’s name.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Judge rules White House pressured social networks to “sup...
by mcpackieh on Thursday July 06, 2023 @10:49AM
(#36616824)
It's such an odd thing. I don't think I've ever heard people refusing to say Stalin or Hitler's names. Andrew Jackson isn't alluded to with euphemisms, despite being a piece of shit who perpetrated genocide among other crimes. Nixon doesn't get this for his crimes and shitty policies, nor Truman for the a-bombs or FDR for mass internment of American citizens.
It seems like an idea people got from Harry Potter refusing to say Voldemort.
Re:Judge rules White House pressured social networks to “sup...
by krapp on Thursday July 06, 2023 @12:20PM
(#36618336)
When you've seen enough threads derail, go unhinged and burst into flames at the mere mention of his name, it makes sense.
Re:Judge rules White House pressured social networks to “sup...
by mcpackieh on Thursday July 06, 2023 @12:41PM
(#36618739)
If the conversation is about Trump I don't think there's any hiding that, nor any avoiding of flame wars.
Honestly I think it's a reddit meme from Harry Potter fans.
Re:Judge rules White House pressured social networks to “sup...
by code_duck on Thursday July 06, 2023 @01:00PM
(#36619090)
More of a Twitter thing from my observations, and nobody is thinking about Harry Potter at all.
Re:Judge rules White House pressured social networks to “sup...
by ajkjk on Thursday July 06, 2023 @02:21PM
(#36620497)
Seems like "TFG" made it kinda derail here instead.