News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fast by danem on Wednesday July 05, 2023 @05:42PM (#36607567)
For anyone looking for an in-depth post mortem of the Van Ness bus line, please read the report from the SF Civil Grand Jury here: https://civilgrandjury.sfgov.org/2020_2021/2021%20CGJ%20Repo...
Re:Fast by kfarr on Wednesday July 05, 2023 @05:49PM (#36607646)
Great report except it missed the most obvious recommendation: "decouple transit improvement from utilities projects"
Re:Fast by jljljl on Wednesday July 05, 2023 @06:08PM (#36607866)
The issue was that in this case they couldn’t — a lot of the BRT benefits came from creating a center lane, and that center lane was infeasible unless they did the utility project first.
Re:Fast by kfarr on Wednesday July 05, 2023 @11:35PM (#36610816)
I'm not an expert but have served on BRT CAC for Geary. They could have done side running and defer utilities to another agency at a later date, after which point move to center running. Or any other of the plethora of options that didn't involve a transit agency running a utility project.