News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Who cares about the Ivy League? by armitron on Wednesday July 05, 2023 @10:49AM (#36601202)
> Most Ivy League students weren't born smart.

This seems like a wild assertion to make, and here's something by Scott Alexander that points in the other direction:

https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/secrets-of-the-great-f...

Re:Who cares about the Ivy League? by thebooktocome on Wednesday July 05, 2023 @11:18AM (#36601615)
None of the subsections in that essay do much more than “point”; in classic Scott Alexander fashion he makes a lot of noise and gestures at. . . something. . .

* Privilege

> “One obvious answer would be “privilege”. It’s not completely wrong; once the first talented individual makes a family rich and famous, it has a big leg up.”

But this answer isn’t politically viable for him so he glosses over it.

* Genetics

> “The other obvious answer is “genetics!” I think this one is right, but there are some mysteries here that make it less of a slam dunk.”

He spends a lot of time trying to make this one work but of course it has all the well-known problems that all the eugenicists of the past ran into (e.g., assortative mating doesn’t completely explain Ashkenazi Jews).

* Education

> “Overall I’m not sure I can find any commonalities in these families’ educational styles except that they were all pretty weird.”

* Yudkowsky’s “Hero License”

> “. . .which I have no evidence for.”

Re:Who cares about the Ivy League? by davemp on Wednesday July 05, 2023 @05:00PM (#36607035)
That article seems incredibly hand wavy and useless.

> Suppose Erasmus Darwin had a genius-level IQ of 150.

Not really a strong basis for an argument if you ask me.