Article from a vulgarisation paper: https://www.futura-sciences.com/planete/dossiers/climatologi...
And a pdf from my previous university (way drier, lot of math and inference, nice graphs though): https://web.lmd.jussieu.fr/~jldufres/IUFM_Creteil/Dufresne_b...
I know that I heard something aout CO2 taking 20 years to get to the upper atmosphere around then, too, but not since, and I remember being curious about that and researching it a bit about a decade ago and finding that this is not what most atmospheric scientists believed (anymore?).
I'll look into it tomorrow.
I say this simply because I figured warming at any level would be an issue but what you say sounds plausible.
I have some reading to do.
https://www.epa.gov/ozone-layer-protection/basic-ozone-layer...
Ozone depleting substances that release chlorine include chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), carbon tetrachloride, and methyl chloroform. ODS that release bromine include halons and methyl bromide. Although ODS are emitted at the Earth’s surface, they are eventually carried into the stratosphere in a process that can take as long as two to five years.
I would expect gases with a lower molecular weight to blend into the homosphere even faster.
It takes 2-3 years for the methane to reach those heights, and 20+ for the carbon dioxide. The average increase in temperature we have now is caused by 2003's emissions.
Other informations about how all this work (basic, incomplete, but better than what I usually hear):
Greenhouse effect doesn't really work like a greenhouse.
Obviously it's a lot more complex, with reflection, absorption spectrum of molecules... There is also more than one GHG, there is stratosphere effect, but this explain way better than 'we live in a big greenhouse'.Does that make sense? First time I do this in writing and in English?
I'll take every correction that will not make the explanation too hard (unless I'm flatly wrong and lying instead of vulgarising).