News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Goodreads was the future of book reviews. Then Amazon bou... by smcin on Monday July 03, 2023 @07:31PM (#36580191)
Not really because any acquisition is going to have a non-compete to prevent that obvious scenario.

Goodreads' Otis Chandler in 2021 invested [0] in BookClub [1] ("building actionable learning cultures through books, for teams").

And Elizabeth Khuri [2] and Chandler both also invested in Looped [3] (a more engaged and interactive livestreaming event service for concerts, comedy and other entertainment)

[0]: https://www.crunchbase.com/person/otis-chandler

[1]: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/bookclub

[2]: https://www.crunchbase.com/person/elizabeth-khuri

[3]: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/looped-6aae

Re:Goodreads was the future of book reviews. Then Amazon bou... by Qwertious on Tuesday July 04, 2023 @02:40AM (#36583015)
>Not really because any acquisition is going to have a non-compete to prevent that obvious scenario.

This applies even without the non-competes - it takes time to set up a new company and gain marketshare, so even without non-competes the monopoly is successfully kicking the can down the road. And every extra year of monopoly is another years' worth of price-gouging profits, so repeatedly buying out competitors can be worthwhile.

Re:Goodreads was the future of book reviews. Then Amazon bou... by smcin on Tuesday July 04, 2023 @05:58AM (#36584471)
Sure, but if you combine the overall time and market-share advantage due to the non-compete, golden handcuffs/earn-out clauses and non-hireaway, the acquirer gets a big first-mover advantage.

I wondered why noone else had since tried to do a book discovery engine at an industrial-scale to compete with Amazon. Here's one 2019 list of book-discovery sites: "Broke By Books: 20 Great Book Websites for Finding What to Read Next" [0]

and here's one analysis [1] of the key things Goodreads added value for Amazon: Kindle integration (social, ratings), a storefront that lets them push Kindle as the preferred version for purchases (or else Audible, or Prime and Kindle Unlimited subscription programs), data that can be mined from user reviews and ratings to power ML for better recommendations, understanding users' book- and reading-habits, rich content to increase interaction and hold user attention...

I also wondered why the Goodreads cofounders hadn't gone and founded other companies, in other sectors.

[0]: https://brokebybooks.com/20-great-book-websites-for-finding-...

[1]: "Who owns Goodreads?" https://bookriot.com/who-owns-goodreads/

Re:Goodreads was the future of book reviews. Then Amazon bou... by dexterdog on Wednesday July 05, 2023 @11:41AM (#36601997)
Which is why the founder that succeeded and got the sale is not the one building the new version. He is going off and re-doing an unrelated acquisition.
Re:Goodreads was the future of book reviews. Then Amazon bou... by smcin on Saturday July 08, 2023 @09:06PM (#36650404)
No, I pointed out that Goodreads' Otis Chandler and Elizabeth Khuri did not go anywhere after the 2013 acquisition. They stayed, for years. Khuri is still there; Chandler continued as Goodreads' CEO till 2019.

I was surprised neither of them left sooner than that to do anything new, in any sector.

Re:Goodreads was the future of book reviews. Then Amazon bou... by dexterdog on Sunday July 16, 2023 @06:54PM (#36752242)
Sometimes golden handcuffs are very comfortable because of the aforementioned gold.