Re:StackOverflow
by icebraining on Friday March 02, 2012 @10:32PM
(#3659277)
The basic question that I asked was: Why is MS held to a different standard to the big guys of the internet (chiefly Apple, Facebook, Google, Oracle, paypal/ebay)? What recent actions do we have to compare them on?
Why does it have to be recent? Should we just whitewash the past? It was ten years ago, not in the 19th century. They even have the same CEO.
But in any case, they're still extorting companies using their grotesque FAT patents.
What about the secure boot story http://arstechnica.com/business/news/2012/01/microsoft-manda...
That's recent and it is evil. Microsoft never was completely evil they just put the mighty dollar above everything else including software quality.
Re:StackOverflow
by SideburnsOfDoom on Saturday March 03, 2012 @05:32AM
(#3659867)
Good answer, thanks.
I agree that MS is profit-driven. I just don't see how that puts them on a different plane from Facebook, Google, Apple, Oracle, Paypal et al.
If Google sells ads to me, or my personal information that I gave them down the road, then that affects me.
If Microsoft uses their power to force future hardware to be unable to boot linux / other FOSS OSes, then that affects me WAY MORE.
So much more that I consider such actions to be on a different plane.
Re:StackOverflow
by SideburnsOfDoom on Saturday March 03, 2012 @07:41AM
(#3660039)
Google and Apple are both involved in OS and hardware. Their locking decisions could be comparable, i.e. on the same plane.
The basic question that I asked was: Why is MS held to a different standard to the big guys of the internet (chiefly Apple, Facebook, Google, Oracle, paypal/ebay)? What recent actions do we have to compare them on?