Please don't comment about the voting on comments. It never
does any good, and it makes boring reading.
Besides, isn't downvoting someone for nonsensical, petty reasons (and leaving no response as to why, of course) at least as harmful to the overall discussion as referring to those downvotes?
It's a hopeless one. People who downvote generally think you're not worth actually answering. Also note that heated language often gets automatically downvoted. And with few exceptions ("eating babies is bad"), one sided opinions tend to be less popular than anything that appears "balanced".
It's especially tough if your one sided opinion is attacking a popular practice.
> Besides, isn't downvoting someone for nonsensical, petty reasons (and leaving no response as to why, of course) at least as harmful to the overall discussion as referring to those downvotes?
I would imagine so. However, the culture here AFAIK is to down/up vote as one sees fit and not provide an explanation of same.
HTH
> Games just happen to have a lot of operations that need column-based access; but that's not true for all domains. When you go and blindly push the game best practices into other domain, you are just making everybody's life hard and most systems worse.
There's no reason why "blindly pushing game best practices" is really any more blind than "blindly creating one table per noun in your domain", as the rest of you all do. Yes, you do.
So what is it? What is the domain that is so obviously devoid of important concern-based operations that you silently downvote a comment for mentioning 12 extremely common examples? Obviously your domain has no text, no record archiving, no soft deleting, no commenting, no tracking of changes. What is this domain?