News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Compromised Linode, thousands of BitCoins stolen by bigiain on Thursday March 01, 2012 @09:57PM (#3655139)
Interesting.

I'll freely admit I've only been thinking about this since reading this article, so I'm both not-fully-informed and I'm thinking about it as a response to some guy losing ~$13k, but to me it's _not_ reasonable.

(And my $19.95 number is perhaps hyperbolically chosen from their least expensive vps offering - but my assumption would be that the management/hypervisor back end would be shared across their entire infrastructure, so I think my argument holds, in that I'd expect the higher priced offerings to "only" have the employee-reliability-assurance of the cheapest vps…)

Re:Compromised Linode, thousands of BitCoins stolen by nknight on Thursday March 01, 2012 @10:14PM (#3655175)
Why are you looking at it as "X has the same assurance as Y" instead of "Y has the same assurance as X"?

If you've got a vault that holds a massive diamond, and a little gold ring, do you become concerned because the diamond "only" has the protection of a little gold ring?