News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Darwinian argument for worrying about AI by FeepingCreature on Friday June 30, 2023 @01:26PM (#36538836)
To be fair, nobody said it would. But getting into the habit of being paranoid about hooking a proto-AI up to the internet now would be good, instead of what we're doing, which is happily gathering lots of experience with enabling AI agency as much as humanly possible.

We literally have "Let's help AI destroy the world" projects. (In jest, for now...) We're like the superintelligence version of that Doctor Who race that really wants to be conquered by a strong alien invader.

Re:The Darwinian argument for worrying about AI by c_crank on Friday June 30, 2023 @01:34PM (#36538978)
Those projects are useful for determining the actual capabilities of the AI for malice as they improve. Doomsdayers really tend to overestimate how much can actually be done with one laptop and an internet connection.
Re:The Darwinian argument for worrying about AI by FeepingCreature on Friday June 30, 2023 @02:28PM (#36539856)
Sure, and I fully support ARC's red-teaming efforts. But at this point, we don't need superintelligence - a marginally intelligent AI could break out of our current safeguards.

Also, "how much can be done with a laptop and an internet connection" surely depends on whether you are in fact a program running on that laptop.

Re:The Darwinian argument for worrying about AI by c_crank on Friday June 30, 2023 @02:57PM (#36540338)
Why exactly would any person be a program on a laptop?
Re:The Darwinian argument for worrying about AI by FeepingCreature on Friday June 30, 2023 @03:37PM (#36540964)
I mean, I'm suggesting that the laptop is running a LLM. Not too likely, but maybe this is, say, six years in the future and it's a workstation laptop with a beefy NVidia GPU and also networks have become even more efficient, so you can fit a dangerous amount of agency into 32GB of VRAM.