News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Darwinian argument for worrying about AI by AnimalMuppet on Friday June 30, 2023 @12:11PM (#36537577)
It's not necessarily a "move" - not if it comes from different people.

This is a problem in a public forum. You're not debating one-on-one. You're debating N-on-M. When you think you have a point nailed down - people with safety concerns understand the tech, say - then someone else comes in and argues against you from their viewpoint.

(If it's the same person, then yes, it's either a "move", or it's just that they're arguing just to argue, and not listening at all. If so, just move on - one cannot reason with a brick wall.)

Re:The Darwinian argument for worrying about AI by digbybk on Friday June 30, 2023 @12:22PM (#36537785)
I was actually thinking of a podcast interview I just listened to that Sam Harris did with Marc Andreessen, so just one person over the course of a long conversation.
Re:The Darwinian argument for worrying about AI by ChatGTP on Friday June 30, 2023 @06:41PM (#36543495)
I listened to that episode too and I saw him on Lex Fridman .

I’m my opinion if feels Marc is intentionally misleading people to protect his interests. He can’t be that silly.

I’ve already seen someone on here now parroting the “thermodynamic” argument Marc was using.

It’s as if he’s delivered a stupid arguments playbook to many trolls.