Exactly. Your argument is incomplete and therefore wrong. If you were denied admission to a university you applied to, it is because you are incapable of making a complete argument, not just due to AA.

> it is on You to provide proof that few percentage of native born Blacks at ivy league create any benefit (that exceeds the damage caused by fraudulent 75% )

Why? I am not arguing for AA. Once again, please read and understand the comments.

I need to see proof to be convinced that your claim has any merit

And your ad hominem attacks do not make your claim any more credible (I did go to ivy btw)

One of the lesser ones, not the one you wanted if your comments are representative of your thought processes.

> Your baseless claim that my argument is incomplete is itself without ground.

All policies are evaluated based on net benefit to society. I explained why your argument didn't meet that standard. If you didn't understand it, that is your problem.

Net benefit - is your made up argument.

Is this “net benefit” in the room with you right now? Perhaps you could quantify it, if you could find any

I already explained that this is how all policies are evaluated, not on arbitrary fraud thresholds. I cannot make you understand it any more than I can make you smart enough to have been accepted at your preferred university.