Re:Kim Dotcom: US Government Is Protecting An Outdated Monop...
by jonhendry on Thursday March 01, 2012 @12:15PM
(#3652989)
"Please separate illegal from immoral."
It does someone no harm to do without watching Transformers 3 for a year. There's no moral high ground in lacking discipline. Therefore, it's immoral and illegal.
Get a new hobby, and some perspective.
Re:Kim Dotcom: US Government Is Protecting An Outdated Monop...
by vibrunazo on Thursday March 01, 2012 @12:48PM
(#3653126)
How does purposely providing your user with a worse experience does no harm? That goes against any UX lesson or advice I've ever seen.
Re:Kim Dotcom: US Government Is Protecting An Outdated Monop...
by jonhendry on Thursday March 01, 2012 @09:41PM
(#3655103)
It does no meaningful harm. The person isn't going to go hungry.
If your biggest problem is waiting through the previews before a blu-ray movie, maybe you should read a book instead. Or take up gardening.
Re:Kim Dotcom: US Government Is Protecting An Outdated Monop...
by ssebro on Thursday March 01, 2012 @12:30PM
(#3653056)
Not true. Please see http://news.ycombinator.org/item?id=3653006
While it's really sad that many lost their jobs breeding horses when automobiles were invented, it was a total net positive to humanity. You can't ignore one of the sides.
While it's sad that some artists may lose their jobs when their cd is pirated. While is true that some potential artists may not have enough incentive to create. You cannot ignore that art will never cease to exist simply because of piracy. You can't ignore that sharing, remixing and freedom to fork and improve the work of others, do have a positive impact in the quality of arts. you cannot deny that better, drm free distribution models are many times a better experience for consumers.
So is it a net benefit at the end of the day? Ill save my opinion, but please do consider both sides of the coin, instead of blindly citing a few of the arguments for one side while ignoring the other.