Re:The Mac Pro’s biggest problem is the MacBook
by peyton on Thursday June 29, 2023 @09:56AM
(#36520430)
Great for Cyberpunk 2077, but not great if you need more than 24 GiB.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Mac Pro’s biggest problem is the MacBook
by greedo on Thursday June 29, 2023 @10:17AM
(#36520668)
Considering the RTX 6000 ADA is like $8k, you could add three 4090s for half the cost.
Re:The Mac Pro’s biggest problem is the MacBook
by mort96 on Thursday June 29, 2023 @11:08AM
(#36521422)
You know what, that's actually fair. If your workload needs tons of GPU memory, nothing probably beats the Mac Pro's up to 192GB.
Except, I guess, for the Mac Studio.
Re:The Mac Pro’s biggest problem is the MacBook
by lostmsu on Thursday June 29, 2023 @11:21AM
(#36521616)
Is there a workload that actually needs more than 24GB of VRAM that can't be offloaded to regular RAM.
I honestly don't have any examples out of my head. LLM inference is compute bound AFAIK.
Re:The Mac Pro’s biggest problem is the MacBook
by crasm on Thursday June 29, 2023 @02:05PM
(#36524324)
LLM inference is GPU bound and VRAM bound. Given quantization however, 2x3090 or 4090 (48GB) is enough VRAM to load 65B quantized llama derivatives (30-40GB). With exllama you can get maybe 20-30 tok/s with dual 4090s on ~1200W. With an M2 Ultra maybe 10 tok/s on ~178W.
(I don't have these devices but have been researching LLM inference performance in the interest of buying a machine for them.)
Advantage goes to M2 Ultra if you ever might need more than 48GB VRAM. I think it's unlikely nvidia is going to release a significantly higher VRAM consumer card anytime soon, since that's what their A100s are for.