Your source claims no such thing. EVs may be heavier than equivalent ICE cars, but an electric Smart (the brand) is going to do less damage than a loaded Ford F150.
Tax the weight, not a shitty proxy for weight.
Your comparison is misleading. Compare an ICE car to an EV car, not the lightest EV to the heaviest ICE.
It is pretty much insignificant increase on road wear vs what trucks put on it?
If you meant SUVs or pick-ups by trucks yeah, insignificant and a bad proxy for weight anyway. No point in taxing EVs when what you need to tax is weight.
Over in the EU it seems that taxes and duties represent at least half of the cost of petrol, more in some member states
https://www.statista.com/statistics/937796/pump-price-and-ta...
Q: How are governments going to replace this?
Add a supplemental registration tax to EVs and hybrids to make up the cost of consuming less fuel. Of course, taxes never go away, so enjoy this new tax as we enter an electric future.
Q: How much fuel duty and tax does the average ICE vehicle (or rather, its driver) contribute?
I did some back-of-napkin math and came up with a figure of €500
This is an unambiguously, heavily supported claim. By states, car makers, the federal government, and third party analysis firms. It's incredibly uncontroversial. It's even got a name, and associated math: it's called the Fourth Power Law https://www.insidescience.org/news/how-much-damage-do-heavy-...
> shouldn't we expect that a vehicle exerting three times the pressure on the road should pay more per mile than 'just' 3x what you and I do in our gas passenger cars
Gas taxes make up a relatively small part of the cost of gas. If you run the numbers, you'll find that it's maybe closer to around 3.5-4x for most passenger EVs. At scale, that becomes a problem, but at the individual level, it's still a relatively small amount - and certainly less than the cost of gas.