No, it's a mechanically different plug.
> What point are you trying to make, exactly?
That every other company that has tried to charge EVs has not utterly failed. Your perspective is narrow and it has caused you to believe a falsehood.
And the plug is mechanically different in that it has one fewer pin due too... drum roll please... no 3-phase support. But it is mechanically different, so you can win there too, if you like. Look at you! Winning all the pedantry awards today. So much fun. I mean, we're not having a damn conversation about anything, just arguing over every single word I say that you can possibly find an issue with, but to some people, this is as much fun as you can have.
Pi is exactly 3.
I don't have much use for your sorrys. It's better you think about what you're saying rather than running around in ignorance. Your narrow outlook prevents you from seeing better alternatives.
> And the plug is mechanically different in that it has one fewer pin
No, Type 2 has a different shape and two more pins than Type 1. CCS type 2 is used in more countries than any other EV plug.
Have a read:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combined_Charging_System
Broaden your horizons.
Like I said, you are right about everything. I'm an uncultured imbecile. I'll start reading more, going to museums. I'll travel the world. Europe is paramount when considering US charging infrastructure. The shape of a connector is the most important part. Can we move on and have you tell me your point? What do you actually have to say about Volvo adopting NACS?
It is when you want an example of how to do it right. Europe is a long way ahead of North America in EV infrastructure because of sensible standardization.
Learn from Europe. Europe is doing EV infrastructure better.