Re:Ignoring Boys' Emotional Needs Fuels Public Health Risks
by naasking on Wednesday June 28, 2023 @10:02AM
(#36506629)
I notice you consistently take data that says that lifetime physical discipline can be detrimental to welfare, and change it by claiming that all physical discipline, no matter how infrequent, is physical abuse that is detrimental to welfare. This does not follow.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ignoring Boys' Emotional Needs Fuels Public Health Risks
by commoner on Thursday June 29, 2023 @01:10PM
(#36523346)
The data shows that the use of physical discipline is independently associated with negative emotional, behavioral, and academic outcomes. If there are any studies of the same quality that show otherwise, go ahead and post them. Otherwise, your argument is just like saying that infrequent lead exposure may be beneficial because studies only focus on the negative effects of lifetime lead exposure.
Re:Ignoring Boys' Emotional Needs Fuels Public Health Risks
by naasking on Wednesday July 05, 2023 @05:04PM
(#36607100)
> Otherwise, your argument is just like saying that infrequent lead exposure may be beneficial because studies only focus on the negative effects of lifetime lead exposure.
No, it's saying that infrequent lead exposure is not as harmful as most think, and certainly not as harmful as other environmental pollutants that are more pervasive.
Re:Ignoring Boys' Emotional Needs Fuels Public Health Risks
by commoner on Friday July 07, 2023 @03:46PM
(#36637363)
Corporal punishment is much more pervasive than molestation and rape, which is why it is being highlighted as a major problem. Lead exposure is actually more harmful than most people think, just like corporal punishment.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/jul/30/one-in-t...