A response to the git.centos.org changes

Re:A response to the git.centos.org changes by rincebrain on Monday June 26, 2023 @07:28PM (#36487207)

re:3, In a previous thread about this, someone said that RHEL only would make deals with cloud providers to run RHEL licenses prepackaged if the whole stack was RHEL, and obviously, if the cloud provider is not already running RHEL everywhere, that doesn't work out so well.

(I have no personal experience trying to run anything like this, this is purely citing a previous comment made.)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A response to the git.centos.org changes by bonzini on Tuesday June 27, 2023 @02:12AM (#36489450)

I'll (mostly) copy my reply from there: RHEL guests are supported on RHEL host but also on Windows, ESX, Amazon and Google clouds, and a few more.

Non-RHEL hosts are only supported is Red Hat has someone to talk to at the vendor or cloud provider, so that they can debug stuff that breaks only in their environment and can't be reproduced. This is done to cannot guarantee the level of support that customers expect but very few cloud provider can provide that. I am not even sure that IBM's cloud made the short list.

On other unsupported hosts we will ask the customer to reproduce on a supported host if we think the host is the culprit.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A response to the git.centos.org changes by SSLy on Tuesday June 27, 2023 @03:54PM (#36497834)

>I am not even sure that IBM's cloud made the short list.

Probably not https://www.redhat.com/en/partners/certified-cloud-and-servi...

[ Parent | on HN ]