News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re: by jondwillis on Monday June 26, 2023 @04:33PM (#36485447)
All of the FAANGs are various levels of unethical, or a net negative for society in my estimation. No more interviewing there for me.
Re: by ryangs on Monday June 26, 2023 @04:36PM (#36485486)
Definitely agree with unethical, although net negative seems a lot harder to quantify. Amazon has a lot of bad practices I disagree with, but are they net negative? I find it difficult to assess. And even if they aren't net negative now, is the 10 year trajectory clearly downward?

Soloing out Netflix, is there anything particularly wrong with them? I have significant gripes with all the others but no specifics about Netflix.

Re: by jondwillis on Monday June 26, 2023 @04:45PM (#36485599)
Netflix: exploitative true crime docs and algorithmic recommendations with no way to opt out, auto-play, reality TV.
Re: by barbariangrunge on Monday June 26, 2023 @05:02PM (#36485810)
I'm stressed out about a lot of things happening in the world right now. While those things you listed aren't ideal, they don't make my top 10 list. I mean, it's hard to find a company that is ethically perfect and this sounds a lot better than most
Re: by JohnFen on Monday June 26, 2023 @04:52PM (#36485685)
> is the 10 year trajectory clearly downward?

I think so, yes. It's been that way for a good while.

Re: by mike00632 on Monday June 26, 2023 @05:15PM (#36485967)
The writers who are currently striking have a lot of things to say about Netflix being negative.
Re: by taway234 on Monday June 26, 2023 @04:40PM (#36485542)
>> All of the FAANGs are various levels of unethical, or a net negative for society in my estimation. No more interviewing there for me.

Feel the same way, until you realize you've cut out half the jobs in the process. Also, wait till you see how much it sucks when loser startups offer you 90kbase + XYZ illiquid options.

Re: by 0xbadcafebee on Monday June 26, 2023 @04:36PM (#36485488)
* * *
Re: by jondwillis on Monday June 26, 2023 @04:48PM (#36485619)
You and tens of thousands of other smart people who could be doing something other than maximizing attention and shilling trash products. Good luck undoing 3.5MM of damage with social work.
Re: by lesuorac on Monday June 26, 2023 @04:58PM (#36485772)
I mean stick with math for everything. Value of a human life is ~10M [1] so it's pretty easy to undo 3.5M of damage if you spend decades helping people.

[1]: https://www.npr.org/2020/04/23/843310123/how-government-agen...

Re: by scarface_74 on Monday June 26, 2023 @06:53PM (#36486943)
Do you work for a non profit?
Re: by zht on Monday June 26, 2023 @04:52PM (#36485682)
you might net 200K a year if you're lucky, and assuming you live like a miser and save/invest 150K a year, that's really not enough to retire on
Re: by JohnFen on Monday June 26, 2023 @04:56PM (#36485735)
Doesn't the depend on where you live and how old you are?

In my part of the US, you can live like a king on $200k/yr and such jobs aren't rare. You can live better than 90% of the people here on $100k, and putting 100k/yr away for retirement is genuinely more than enough unless you're in your 40s or so.

But I know there are other parts of the US where what you say is 100% true.

Re: by zht on Monday June 26, 2023 @06:38PM (#36486809)
and OP was saying that he'd like to work for 10 years and retire. it's not really retirement if you only stop working for 10 years.

I just mean that you need far higher incomes than 350K for 10 years (gross) to be able to stop working entirely

Re: by JohnFen on Monday June 26, 2023 @07:24PM (#36487175)
Oh, I missed that part. Yes, if you want to shoot for that goal, it requires a huge sacrifice and a lot of misery.
Re: by scarface_74 on Monday June 26, 2023 @04:50PM (#36485645)
Is the company you are working for using any of the cloud providers? Are you using computers built by low wage workers? Do you use Amazon? Google? Microsoft?

Or does it make you feel better that you aren’t working for them directly?

Re: by jondwillis on Monday June 26, 2023 @04:57PM (#36485749)
Yeah, of course I use them. It’s practically impossible to use the internet without them. No ethical consumption and all.

It makes me feel better that I am not directly working for them in the same way that putting plastic in my recycling bin makes me feel better about having no choice but to have plastic waste follow me around everywhere.

edit) have you tried eating food without having plastic involved?

Re: by scarface_74 on Monday June 26, 2023 @05:15PM (#36485963)
I find it difficult to take people seriously who continuously clutch their pearls about the evil of BigTech yet and still benefit from it.

I bet you dollars to donuts that you’re making a higher than median wage working in tech instead of being a teacher, working at a non profit etc.

The tech industry is a net negative on society. Yet it’s a net positive for you. It’s the other people that it hurts.

I bet most Mormons use very little plastic when they eat - they have the courage of their convictions.

I hate to break it to you. But most things you separate for recycling isn’t actually recycled.

Re: by jondwillis on Monday June 26, 2023 @09:05PM (#36487837)
that’s the point i was making
Re: by scarface_74 on Monday June 26, 2023 @09:29PM (#36487959)
So it’s all theatrics just to make you feel good even though you know it doesn’t do any good?
Re: by GaryNumanVevo on Monday June 26, 2023 @05:02PM (#36485809)
Grinding leetcode for a month or two to get a 400k+ TC is definitely worth the effort up front. It's probably the easiest way to earn that much money short of going to medical school or getting your JD.