JP Morgan accidentally deletes evidence in record retention screwup

Re:JP Morgan accidentally deletes evidence in record retenti... by gmd63 on Monday June 26, 2023 @12:15PM (#36481730)

I think corporations of "too big to fail" stature should have different legal protections than what are offered to humans.

Innocent until proven guilty is not quite fair to apply to corporations that get bailed out by taxpayers when the policemen are driving bicycles trying to enforce the speed limit on a highway full of McLarens.

When a company has positioned itself to be a critical organ of society, it should be required to function properly. The rules of nature do not forgive a well meaning hare that didn't intend to be eaten by a lion.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:JP Morgan accidentally deletes evidence in record retenti... by pnemonic on Monday June 26, 2023 @01:34PM (#36482976)

The rules of nature do not forgive a well meaning hare that didn't intend to be eaten by a lion.

I love this. Consider yourself quoted.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:JP Morgan accidentally deletes evidence in record retenti... by gmd63 on Monday June 26, 2023 @03:01PM (#36484253)

Thank you for the kind words.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:JP Morgan accidentally deletes evidence in record retenti... by danuker on Monday June 26, 2023 @09:25PM (#36487944)

I am of the position that no company should be allowed to become too big to fail. Or, if one does, it should be nationalized.

If its service is crucial and no other company can replace it, then there is a high risk that it makes use of its position by charging an arm and a leg for essential services.

[ Parent | on HN ]