I'm Done with Red Hat (Enterprise Linux)

Re:I'm Done with Red Hat (Enterprise Linux) by pamhalpert on Monday June 26, 2023 @11:31AM (#36481028)

So, what Red Hat already offers.... Was Alma and co doing upstream development where they can prove it? Was Oracle patching upstream first or only in oracle linux? Was Rocky offering anything unique, value adding, or were they just copy pasting and selling?

It may sound loaded, but I'm genuinely asking, because from what I've seen the answer in regards to value add is pretty ambiguous.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I'm Done with Red Hat (Enterprise Linux) by 5e92cb50239222b on Monday June 26, 2023 @11:46AM (#36481292)

https://lwn.net/Articles/929582

AFAIK Oracle employs major contributors to btrfs and XFS. I'm mostly interested in filesystems, so I can't speak for other subsystems (seems like they do a decent amount of work on core kernel development — the really important stuff like schedulers and the memory subsystem — second place just below Google).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I'm Done with Red Hat (Enterprise Linux) by Conan_Kudo on Monday June 26, 2023 @04:06PM (#36485113)

Oracle Linux is also not a pure RHEL clone. They customize it as they desire and ship it accordingly. For example, they have an alternative kernel for their distribution with different features.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I'm Done with Red Hat (Enterprise Linux) by attentive on Monday June 26, 2023 @05:54PM (#36486397)

But they also have RHEL native kernel version for version if you're to choose to run that instead. It's just that RHEL kernel is usually very old and UEK kernel has more modern features and improvements in it.

Overall while they have some extra packages available they are on top of RHEL clone and you don't have to use them.

[ Parent | on HN ]