Re:Databricks Strikes $1.3B Deal for Generative AI Startup M...
by throwaway54232 on Monday June 26, 2023 @08:52AM
(#36479082)
This was my guess as well. I am wondering what you see as the "prospect of irrelevance" they are facing. I have my guess but I would like to hear your take.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Databricks Strikes $1.3B Deal for Generative AI Startup M...
by stingraycharles on Monday June 26, 2023 @12:14PM
(#36481710)
People are doing more and more self-hosting and desire PaaS-like offerings that run in their own cloud, rather than SaaS “we manage your spark cluster for you” which is what DataBricks was founded upon. PaaS has significantly thinner margins, but it’s desirable from the customers’ perspective as it’s cheaper and much better from a (data) security point of view.
As such, they’ll be forced to do a lot more services oriented work rather than product / platform oriented work, because it pays well. Their sales team is also excellent. I see a similar fate for them as Cloudera.
Re:Databricks Strikes $1.3B Deal for Generative AI Startup M...
by kthejoker2 on Monday June 26, 2023 @01:50PM
(#36483204)
> People are doing more and more self-hosting and desire PaaS-like offerings that run in their own cloud, rather than SaaS
Do you have some data to support this? This is a pretty bold claim.
Re:Databricks Strikes $1.3B Deal for Generative AI Startup M...
by hodgesrm on Monday June 26, 2023 @09:43PM
(#36488024)
+1. I would be delighted to see that data as well. I mean we all like the idea of local control but local PaaS is hard to do in a general way.
Re:Databricks Strikes $1.3B Deal for Generative AI Startup M...
by bobbruno on Tuesday July 04, 2023 @05:15PM
(#36592581)
You can find an article on Bloomberg stating that Databricks’ annual revenue has grown by 60%, which sort of backs the SaaS hypothesis it bets on. Do you have data on your PaaS hypothesis that is bigger than that?
Source: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-06-13/databrick...