News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ignoring Boys' Emotional Needs Fuels Public Health Risks by lapcat on Monday June 26, 2023 @12:31AM (#36475740)
> but it's verboten to even mention

You just did.

I find it curious, though, that a number of commenters seem to focus almost entirely on the "present" aspect and not on the crucial emotional investment aspect discussed in the article: "when fathers are present and emotionally invested in children’s lives", the title of which says "what boys really need is emotional support from their dads".

Presence alone is not necessarily helpful, and indeed can be harmful, as demonstrated by countless abusive parents. On the other hand, an emotionally invested parent can make a positive impact regardless of whether they're married.

Re:Ignoring Boys' Emotional Needs Fuels Public Health Risks by weberer on Monday June 26, 2023 @06:40AM (#36478002)
>>but it's verboten to even mention

>You just did.

And now his comment is grey.

Re:Ignoring Boys' Emotional Needs Fuels Public Health Risks by lapcat on Monday June 26, 2023 @08:31AM (#36478887)
> And now his comment is grey.

It's not, as far as I see now.

Anyway, downvoting on HN is not the same thing as "verboten". Downvoting is a feature of HN that is supposed to put higher quality comments higher up and lower quality comments lower down. (I'm not saying it works, but that's the theory.)