I Shouldn’t Have to Accept Being in Deepfake Porn

Re:I Shouldn’t Have to Accept Being in Deepfake Porn by kthejoker2 on Monday June 26, 2023 @12:04AM (#36475620)

More useless philosophizing, answer the post directly.

If a specific someone (like the author) says I do not want a deepfake porn of me, and someone else says I don't care, I made one ..

Was harm done? If no, why not?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I Shouldn’t Have to Accept Being in Deepfake Porn by kcplate on Monday June 26, 2023 @01:17AM (#36475988)

Ok, easy enough.

No…if there is no objective legal definition of harm to confirm the subjective understanding of harm in your example.

Yes…if there is an objective legal definition of harm to confirm the subjective understanding of harm in your example.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I Shouldn’t Have to Accept Being in Deepfake Porn by kthejoker2 on Monday June 26, 2023 @11:47AM (#36481314)

So you've just outsourced your personal moral code to the law? How ... enlightened you are.

Letting yourself be an empty vessel for the state to fill as they seem fit sounds sacrificial.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I Shouldn’t Have to Accept Being in Deepfake Porn by kcplate on Monday June 26, 2023 @12:47PM (#36482257)

Not at all, but I am realistic enough to know that we cannot have over 8 billion separate definitions of the word “harm” that are actionable. There needs to be a standard that is agreed upon and the law is the source of that.

[ Parent | on HN ]