Re:Ignoring Boys' Emotional Needs Fuels Public Health Risks
by yowlingcat on Sunday June 25, 2023 @10:30PM
(#36475041)
But if you talk about that, then all of a sudden you are a conspiracy theorist. Nevermind the incentives in play that would make that solve a very significant amount of otherwise seemingly intractable problems humans face in the present decade.
Re:Ignoring Boys' Emotional Needs Fuels Public Health Risks
by yarg on Sunday June 25, 2023 @11:14PM
(#36475331)
We've been (I say we) sexually reproducing for over 1,000,000,000 years.
And yet somehow we've reached the point where if you acknowledge human sexual dimorphism, you're a fascist.
It's a damned weird ideology, and if it doesn't go away it should at least be acknowledged as a religion.
Re:Ignoring Boys' Emotional Needs Fuels Public Health Risks
by breakyerself on Monday July 03, 2023 @01:19PM
(#36576061)
Acknowledging how things are isn't fascism. Imposing your ideas about how things should be in a way that harms trans people is fascist.
Re:Ignoring Boys' Emotional Needs Fuels Public Health Risks
by type0 on Monday June 26, 2023 @06:13PM
(#36486589)
The goal is parthenogenesis, I think Seksmisja movie is prophetic in some sense
Re:Ignoring Boys' Emotional Needs Fuels Public Health Risks
by breakyerself on Monday July 03, 2023 @01:18PM
(#36576049)
Hey nice hyperbolic strawman you've got there. It's actually the opposite. Transphobes think sex is interchangeable and can be imposed from the outside. The rest of us think gender comes from the inside and simply believe in loving and supporting people regardless of how THEY express their own gender.
People like you want to impose an external concept of gender onto trans people that doesn't comport with their self image. You want to forgo the medical science and drive trans people into depression and suicide because the idea of it makes you feel yucky.
Do you think that maybe human extinction is part of the goal?