Re:Ignoring Boys' Emotional Needs Fuels Public Health Risks
by Gibbon1 on Sunday June 25, 2023 @06:16PM
(#36473186)
I've come around to replace 'insert group name' with the word Jews and see how it sounds.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ignoring Boys' Emotional Needs Fuels Public Health Risks
by arp242 on Sunday June 25, 2023 @07:29PM
(#36473745)
I call this the "Muslim test": https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27045005
I use "Muslim", mostly because there's been a lot of negativity and discrimination surrounding Muslims in my own country, but obviously whatever works for you.
Re:Ignoring Boys' Emotional Needs Fuels Public Health Risks
by somewhereoutth on Sunday June 25, 2023 @09:15PM
(#36474525)
This works with very nearly every class except men. Men as a whole class will never be rounded up and slaughtered in the way that Jews (and various other religious or ethnic groups) have been. After all, who would do it? Women?
Re:Ignoring Boys' Emotional Needs Fuels Public Health Risks
by Gibbon1 on Sunday June 25, 2023 @09:26PM
(#36474615)
> Men as a whole class will never be rounded up and slaughtered
Re:Ignoring Boys' Emotional Needs Fuels Public Health Risks
by somewhereoutth on Sunday June 25, 2023 @09:43PM
(#36474740)
Um, two groups of men fighting each other? But for territory / political reasons, not because 'kill all men'
Re:Ignoring Boys' Emotional Needs Fuels Public Health Risks
by sneed_chucker on Sunday June 25, 2023 @11:00PM
(#36475245)
The men doing the killing and being killed were largely doing so because they were forced (through conscription) or societally conditioned to enlist.
No, it's not like the Holocaust, but it's an example of how men are treated as expendable.