News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ignoring Boys' Emotional Needs Fuels Public Health Risks by troupe on Sunday June 25, 2023 @04:54PM (#36472489)
> only so valuable because the only fathers that stick around are the ones that care.

Last time I looked at data about this, it appeared that even a poor father who was present was better than no having a father in the home. If I remember right it was measuring the likeliness of a teenager to end up in prison. If there was a segment of fathers that were worse than not having a father, I don't think it shows up in any study I've seen.

Gilder's Wealth and Poverty book cites a lot of studies and examples showing how society has changed in ways making it harder for dads to stick around with everything from how drug policies are enforced to the way that welfare resources are allocated.

Re:Ignoring Boys' Emotional Needs Fuels Public Health Risks by lmm on Sunday June 25, 2023 @06:37PM (#36473373)
> Last time I looked at data about this, it appeared that even a poor father who was present was better than no having a father in the home. If I remember right it was measuring the likeliness of a teenager to end up in prison. If there was a segment of fathers that were worse than not having a father, I don't think it shows up in any study I've seen.

I think their point is that those bad fathers don't show up, because they don't care about their children.