News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The bigger-is-better approach to AI is running out of road by d-cc on Sunday June 25, 2023 @02:34AM (#36465590)
The free will "debate", as most consider it, is an utter joke. A tumor or large amount of kinetic energy to the right parts of your, or anybody else's, brain can turn them into an unredeemable monster.
Re:The bigger-is-better approach to AI is running out of road by b1daly on Sunday June 25, 2023 @06:46AM (#36466843)
doesn’t your example make clear the existence and nature of free will?

it’s obvious in its absence

Re:The bigger-is-better approach to AI is running out of road by d-cc on Sunday June 25, 2023 @03:28PM (#36471733)
I'd argue that it's not obvious in it's absence, see: the philosophical zombie thought experiment

The secret is that we are all philosophical zombies to begin with.

Re:The bigger-is-better approach to AI is running out of road by d-cc on Sunday June 25, 2023 @03:36PM (#36471798)
Recently, I've dealt with behavioral issues with my aging mother brought about by a series of different factors, but most significantly age-related cognitive decline.

Trying to determine if she was acting in a certain way intentionally or unintentionally was fundamentally impossible. In the past, I mistreated her thinking she was choosing to behave in certain ways whenever she really didn't have much of a choice, but then later I realized that to some extent and in some situations, she was. It's an extremely murky line, what decisions were being made due to other influences and what decisions were being made by her, that line never existed to begin with as who her consciousness is fundamentally is determined exclusively by 'outside' influences. Separating her identity as an entity from her material manifestation is likely nonsensical.