Re:AMD's 128-core Epycs could spell trouble for Ampere Compu...
by eldenring on Sunday June 25, 2023 @12:36AM
(#36465171)
This is absolutely not true, having shared memory or even just being able to communicate over local os pipes is massivley simpler than introducing a network.
Re:AMD's 128-core Epycs could spell trouble for Ampere Compu...
by ilyt on Sunday June 25, 2023 @04:58AM
(#36466212)
And orders of magnitude faster
Re:AMD's 128-core Epycs could spell trouble for Ampere Compu...
by ilyt on Sunday June 25, 2023 @04:58AM
(#36466209)
Sure if you never programmed anything complex that needs actual communication and not just submitting job results at the end
Re:AMD's 128-core Epycs could spell trouble for Ampere Compu...
by imtringued on Sunday June 25, 2023 @05:32AM
(#36466388)
8 servers use up one third of a rack.
You need interprocess communication that works across machines.
You need to orchestrate the deployment of software.
Communication within a machine is much faster.
If we're just running several processes there's not much difference from just running 8 computers each with 16 cores.