News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Decades-long bet on consciousness ends – it’s philosopher... by SAI_Peregrinus on Saturday June 24, 2023 @01:09PM (#36460582)
> The question is also 'why does a human form a single consciousness?'.

It doesn't seem to. When dreaming, it's possible to carry out conversations with other "people" in the dream which are indistinguishable from conscious beings you meet when awake. There's usually a single "self" in dreams, but the brain certainly seems to form extra consciousnesses on demand which react as though they had a sense of "self".

Re:Decades-long bet on consciousness ends – it’s philosopher... by tonymillion on Saturday June 24, 2023 @09:31PM (#36464370)
Is that different from having an imaginary conversation "in your head" with an imagined person?

i.e. I often imagine conversations I'm about to have in my "mental pre planning" phase, usually when dealing with government officials - many of whom are belligerent officious jobsworths. They're obviously not "me" and their responses aren'y something I "think" about before they respond "in my mind".

Could that be a temporary virtual consciousness (like a virtual CPU)?

Re:Decades-long bet on consciousness ends – it’s philosopher... by kaba0 on Sunday June 25, 2023 @02:34AM (#36465589)
It’s just time sharing, we can’t really do parallel thought. But signal processing does happen in parallel obviously, often times not even having to “interrupt” the CPU (e.g. reflexes can react before the signal reaches the brain, but the brain itself also has different parts, so coordinating walking won’t disallow thought)