But it's not like this is limited to Windows. I'd guess that if you tried to open TextEdit on an extremely old and low-end Intel Mac (which again is still an order of magnitude faster than computers 20 years ago, which could edit text just fine), the app would take a while to launch. And it probably wouldn't be a great experience.

I haven't used desktop Linux recently but my expectation would be that e.g. gnome is a little better, but still not great compared to what we had 20 years ago.

So there's just something broadly bloated about modern software. And sure, by and large people don't notice because modern hardware is so damn fast, but we're also forcing users to buy hardware that is much faster than what they should need.

GP points out that faster CPUs allow us to do things that weren't possible in the old days, like real-time video transcoding, and I agree that's great. But if you just need to check your damn email, you should be able to save a great deal of money to buy a machine that's laughably underpowered by "modern" standards, and still check your email at the speed of light.

What is all this software doing? I guess we're e.g. rendering at higher resolutions than we used to, but isn't the GPU supposed to take care of that?