News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The rule says, “No vehicles in the park”. Parent comment

Re:The rule says, “No vehicles in the park” by flaminHotSpeedo on Saturday June 24, 2023 @03:45AM (#36456503)
No, you missed the point entirely. The question was whether the scenario is a violation but the answers were not labeled accordingly.

For an exercise that is, by it's own admission, pedantic by design that's a pretty glaring fault

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The rule says, “No vehicles in the park” by ssnistfajen on Saturday June 24, 2023 @11:43AM (#36459641)
Tell me you've never done (or thought about) content moderation without telling me you've never done or thought about content moderation.

Rules are pedantic by their nature, that's the whole point of interpreting them.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The rule says, “No vehicles in the park” by flaminHotSpeedo on Saturday June 24, 2023 @12:28PM (#36460095)
You've missed the point of my comment too. We all agree that the exercise is pedantic by design, and that the goal of the exercise is to show how much variance there is in interpreting them.

The point, that you've missed twice now, is that the results are presented using incorrect language.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The rule says, “No vehicles in the park” by ssnistfajen on Saturday June 24, 2023 @04:36PM (#36462453)
A point that does not exist is a point that's not possible to be missed. It's okay to admit you don't know anything about content moderation, and frankly it's a blessing to not know anything about it. Best of luck.
[ Parent | on HN ]