https://apnews.com/article/ukraine-war-russia-nuclear-647a54...
If CNN and others are covering it, I think it reinforces my point, that censoring HN is irrelevant.
How is censorship irrelevant? Yes there are other news sources but it’s not a good look for HN.
And increasingly nearly everything that is mainstream news or clickbait shows up on HN anyway, despite the Guidelines page saying it's off topic.
If CNN, Reuters, the AP, the NY Times, are covering something, it will show up 5 minutes later if a given item disappears.
"So accustomed are we to viewing Putin as a master tactician, that the opening salvos of Wagner chief Yevgeny Prigozhin’s disobedience were at times assessed as a feint – a bid by Putin to keep his generals on edge with a loyal henchman as their outspoken critic."
https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/24/europe/russia-putin-wagner-pr...
I really have no idea who would care specifically about censoring it on HN, anyway.
I always thought everything he said was on orders from the highest, either to troll Western media, or else to make the regular military nervous so they wouldn't start a coup.