News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Jessica Livingston by neilv on Friday June 23, 2023 @04:04PM (#36451576)
> e.g. there were times where 7 out of 8 interviewers said "pass", she said "hire" and she was always right.

Just noting: that situation around that assessment can affect the outcome.

For example, hired person appreciates the opportunity/faith extended to them, or otherwise picks up on the need to rise to the occasion.

Or a manager or other staff sees/treats the person differently because of the circumstances (e.g., gives the hire more guidance because they think the hire will need it, wants the hire to succeed because a founder has blessed them, or just sees the person more favorably because they trust the opinion of someone else).

Re:Jessica Livingston by jxf on Friday June 23, 2023 @04:19PM (#36451734)
> For example, hired person appreciates the opportunity/faith extended to them, or otherwise picks up on the need to rise to the occasion.

I don't think it would make sense to tell a hired person "you barely got in here, everybody hated you except for one interviewer".

Re:Jessica Livingston by neilv on Friday June 23, 2023 @04:59PM (#36452092)
Many people can pick up on that situation, during or after.
Re:Jessica Livingston by cbzoiav on Friday June 23, 2023 @06:25PM (#36452998)
Depends how you phrase it.

"Jessica is the reason we hired you - she says you'll be great here and when she says that she's always right" technically says "we weren't going to hire you", but also "we all believe in you".

Re:Jessica Livingston by Jarwain on Friday June 23, 2023 @04:22PM (#36451762)
I mean yes, but not everyone succeeds despite best efforts, and a good social radar might imply detecting whether they Will rise to the occasion or not