News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on People paid to train AI are outsourcing their work to AI. Parent comment

Re:People paid to train AI are outsourcing their work to AI by lisasays on Thursday June 22, 2023 @10:13PM (#36441999)
Per the article, the didn't just use the static detector:

They also extracted the workers’ keystrokes in a bid to work out whether they’d copied and pasted their answers, an indicator that they’d generated their responses elsewhere.

So while I don't yet know if the article is bunk -- I do know that your hot take is bunk.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:People paid to train AI are outsourcing their work to AI by vminvsky on Friday June 23, 2023 @05:39AM (#36444668)
They never used a static detector.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:People paid to train AI are outsourcing their work to AI by lisasays on Friday June 23, 2023 @09:56AM (#36446861)
"Static" in this case refers its being used in isolation (not to any particular kind of detector).

I could have said "they didn't just use the detector all by itself", I suppose.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:People paid to train AI are outsourcing their work to AI by chickenpotpie on Friday June 23, 2023 @08:04AM (#36445694)
Or they typed up their responses in a different text editor and copy and pasted from that?
[ Parent | on HN ]