Re:Debris field found in search for missing submersible
by saberdancer on Thursday June 22, 2023 @04:11PM
(#36438155)
There are videos of them building it. From what I remember, they rolled carbon fiber around a cylinder, making the flat part of the cylinder. Then they mated two titanium half spheres to the end of the carbon fibre cylinder. This was done using some kind of "glue". Meaning that the middle part had no titanium.
I think it was in Sub brief YouTube video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4dka29FSZac&pp=ygUJc3ViIGJya...
Re:Debris field found in search for missing submersible
by mechhacker on Thursday June 22, 2023 @04:43PM
(#36438679)
Thanks, I see now. Wow, that's a thick layup.
Re:Debris field found in search for missing submersible
by SirSourdough on Thursday June 22, 2023 @04:12PM
(#36438175)
I saw a bit of video where they showed the construction- it’s a few inch wide band of carbon fibre wrapped around an inner tube like a spool of thread until it reaches 5” thickness.
Re:Debris field found in search for missing submersible
by floxy on Thursday June 22, 2023 @05:17PM
(#36439143)
Here's a write-up on the composite part of one of Oceangate's vessels:
https://www.compositesworld.com/articles/composite-submersib...
...since that article is from 2017, it is not clear that this was the unit that actually failed.
Re:Debris field found in search for missing submersible
by mechhacker on Friday June 23, 2023 @08:20AM
(#36445829)
Very interesting. Ties sub tech to Steve Fossett, who was working with Scaled Composites before his death.
Not saying they are related at all but I am reminded of this:
Solid 5inch thick carbon composite OR a sandwich design with thick outer facesheets of carbon fiber? I suppose under that pressure not much would take the hydrostatic loads other than carbon, but that seems thick compared to everything I've seen made out of composites.