News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Debris field found in search for missing submersible by carlosdp on Thursday June 22, 2023 @12:37PM (#36434781)
The sub had 7 redundant ways to surface (drop weights / ballast), several of which work without power, and one of which triggers automatically after ~20 hrs of exposure to seawater.

The only way it wouldn't have already surfaced on day 1 is if it got stuck on something (and lost power, unlikely), or it imploded.

Re:Debris field found in search for missing submersible by moneywoes on Thursday June 22, 2023 @03:32PM (#36437514)
What I don’t get is what factors could have caused it to implode now when it didn’t previously?
Re:Debris field found in search for missing submersible by dboreham on Thursday June 22, 2023 @03:56PM (#36437881)
Material failure after a certain number of stress cycles.
Re:Debris field found in search for missing submersible by jandrese on Thursday June 22, 2023 @04:08PM (#36438112)
Failure modes for advanced composites are less well understood than for traditional metals as well. The sub's pressure hull was also made out of three disparate materials joined together which adds additional complications. Carbon Fiber in particular is notorious for performing flawlessly until it catastrophically fails in an instant.
Re:Debris field found in search for missing submersible by chasd00 on Thursday June 22, 2023 @03:58PM (#36437907)
I know doing amateur rocketry pressure vessels work until they don't. Motor cases will gladly handle multiple launches and then on the 20th launch, explode. I think it's a matter of the metal fatiguing over time but I'm not sure how you measure the rate or severity.
Re:Debris field found in search for missing submersible by floxy on Thursday June 22, 2023 @05:05PM (#36439000)