> we believe that most of the value in the emerging generative AI market will be located in the hard-to-make technology, i.e. the generative models themselves,
and they truly can compete with market leaders.
This basically then boils down to: "ChatGPT got x users in a week, and we want to do the same for EU.", without a clear path to profitability or guarantees.
So it's effectively a humongously risky bet by EU VCs?
I mean, ^ describes literally all "AI" VC activity, surely? It is, currently, all speculation.
> So it's effectively a humongously risky bet by EU VCs?
isn't it supposed to be VCs job to bet on risk proposition with the hope of a 100x return?
So, not more open-source than what OpenAI is doing.
The catch, however, is that Germany and UK will also have their own Mistral.
Each will have direct and trivial access to their country's market, but much harder access to their neighbours' country.
From where I conclude that Mistral's TAM is mostly France, not EU.
I see lots of technical stuff, but the complete business plan & roadmap seems to be lacking any kind of tangible use case that is showing me how they plan to differentiate? (The technical reasons they state seem to be fairy minimal, and I don't see anything that competitors couldn't do either.)
The reason that I'm weary about this: I've spent a few years in an "innovation division" after customers repeatedly asked for such a service. Turns out the budget for long-running innovation-as-a-service is a hard sell, because in the end someone always has to pay for it, and innovation just for the sake of it gets old really quick. The long term survivors where the ones who continuously innovated for a particular use case - so more on a project basis...
So I'd assume that, just like with blockchain & VR/AR, the biggest value will be in very specific use cases in very specific verticals, as opposed to the "spray & pray" approach, offering an "AI as a commodity".
Or is this really just a EU FOMO play, i.e. US is doing it so Europe can't stay behind? (Probably hoping for EU funds/grants via that "Cedric O" guy.)