Re:Titanic tourist sub goes missing sparking search
by jacquesm on Tuesday June 20, 2023 @05:51PM
(#36411189)
I've been in the reverse, an autoclave large enough to hold an entire spacecraft. That was already engineering on a scale that defied my imagination considerably, doing the same at the level where an entire sub could be pressurized to 400 atmospheres is engineering on a different plane. I don't think you could do this any cheaper/easier than just strapping it to a tether and dropping it overboard in a very deep part of the ocean, then winch it back in to see if it survived.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Titanic tourist sub goes missing sparking search
by yetanotherloser on Wednesday June 21, 2023 @02:36AM
(#36415146)
Gosh, that's one big autoclave. As you say, a sub tank would be even more of a monster bit of engineering. They do exist for more normal depths but I'm not sure if there are civilian / rentable sub test tanks for this kind of ultra deep stuff.
Re:Titanic tourist sub goes missing sparking search
by tim333 on Wednesday June 21, 2023 @08:05AM
(#36417397)
I guess in practice for something like the titanic sub, you could program it somehow to dive unmanned to some depth deeper than normal use and then resurface. Presumably with some radio beacon so you can find it when it does. Or a long cable connected to monitoring devices. If it didn't come back you'd have lost a sub but not lives.