Missing Titanic Sub Faced Lawsuit over Depths It Could Safely Travel To

Re:Missing Titanic Sub Faced Lawsuit over Depths It Could Sa... by escapedmoose on Tuesday June 20, 2023 @04:37PM (#36410136)

Seemingly, “skin in the game” is only assurance against getting scammed, not incompetence.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Missing Titanic Sub Faced Lawsuit over Depths It Could Sa... by mrguyorama on Tuesday June 20, 2023 @04:57PM (#36410460)

And specifically only protective against getting scammed by someone who does not believe their own bullshit, which isn't always the case.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Missing Titanic Sub Faced Lawsuit over Depths It Could Sa... by BurningFrog on Tuesday June 20, 2023 @06:00PM (#36411287)

There is also a big "grey zone" where people will do a good job when evaluating security for others, but a really good job with their own security.

You could think of this as avoiding "a scam", but there is no conscious intention involved.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Missing Titanic Sub Faced Lawsuit over Depths It Could Sa... by throw9away6 on Wednesday June 21, 2023 @11:07PM (#36427572)

Madoff had skin in the game it didn’t help

[ Parent | on HN ]