Re:Titanic tourist sub goes missing sparking search
by Exuma on Monday June 19, 2023 @07:01PM
(#36397511)
That’s sounds crazy complicated. In engineering is it like software design where you can get very far just being bad? Like do companies hire just crap engineers who don’t know all this stuff and call it a day? (Kind of like hiring offshore to build mvp for cheapiest crappiest quality possible)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Titanic tourist sub goes missing sparking search
by mechhacker on Monday June 19, 2023 @07:54PM
(#36397958)
You can do that but you'll spend a lot of money breaking things. If you're in a non-safety critical field then that is a possibility. But, you really need good engineers, or to make them through these mistakes, to figure out what is really going wrong.
Re:Titanic tourist sub goes missing sparking search
by pjc50 on Tuesday June 20, 2023 @05:20AM
(#36401551)
Software failures don't usually visibly lose money, make a mess, or kill people. (Sometimes they do, see RISKS). So it's possible to have the usual sort of software project failure where something is 200% over budget and time, without anyone really waking up. But if a pressure vessel goes bang people tend to notice.
Re:Titanic tourist sub goes missing sparking search
by digdugdirk on Wednesday June 21, 2023 @09:35AM
(#36418258)
It is crazy complicated. In my experience, most companies have a few highly competent engineers who get funneled the work of lower level engineers with a review process. These engineers will also set up some domain-specific guardrails/guidelines that can help keep the lower level engineers from causing catastrophic issues.
Combine that with a healthy safety factor to cover the unknowable (internal material structure, etc) and you're generally safe.