News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Titanic tourist sub goes missing sparking search by jacquesm on Monday June 19, 2023 @05:53PM (#36396939)
It would be a good thing if the people who did make this contraption also didn't make submersible vessels based on the bits and pieces that have made it into the news so far. This sounded like an accident waiting to happen. At those pressures if something goes wrong it will crumple like a tin can and having the hatch sealed from the outside means that even if they didn't die at depth they may not have a way out if their comms have failed. The whole thing strikes me as beyond irresponsible. I wonder if the people that built the sub would take it to depth.
Re:Titanic tourist sub goes missing sparking search by Yeroc on Monday June 19, 2023 @06:24PM (#36397213)
Well it seems like the President and CEO of the company was onboard the craft so I suppose the answer is "yes".
Re:Titanic tourist sub goes missing sparking search by jacquesm on Monday June 19, 2023 @07:26PM (#36397726)
I highly doubt he built the sub.
Re:Titanic tourist sub goes missing sparking search by wnkrshm on Tuesday June 20, 2023 @05:10AM (#36401487)
They copied the glass fiber + titanium rings idea from the Deepflight Challenger that Virgin wanted to dive with. [0]

Virgin deemed the design not safe enough for more than a single dive and quietly scrapped the diving events: "Based on testing at high pressure, the DeepFlight Challenger was determined to be suitable only for a single dive, not the repeated uses that had been planned as part of Virgin Oceanic service." [1]

[0] https://www.compositesworld.com/articles/composite-submersib... [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeepFlight_Challenger

Re:Titanic tourist sub goes missing sparking search by jacquesm on Tuesday June 20, 2023 @10:03AM (#36404131)
That makes very good sense. Pity they didn't copy the conclusion too.
Re:Titanic tourist sub goes missing sparking search by patrec on Monday June 19, 2023 @07:03PM (#36397522)
In what scenario would not being sealed from the outside make a positive difference? If they managed to surface, how would being able to "get out" in the middle of the ocean be helpful? If they didn't manage to surface, under what circumstances would have opening the hatch helped?
Re:Titanic tourist sub goes missing sparking search by jacquesm on Monday June 19, 2023 @07:25PM (#36397722)
Air.
Re:Titanic tourist sub goes missing sparking search by patrec on Monday June 19, 2023 @07:47PM (#36397894)
True, although fortunately the air supply is meant to last for 4 days. As a passenger I would probably be more alarmed about the apparent absence of some kind of distress beacon than the inability to open the hatch without help.
Re:Titanic tourist sub goes missing sparking search by jacquesm on Monday June 19, 2023 @08:11PM (#36398084)
Well, something went wrong and one of the things that could go wrong is the air supply. I wouldn't be a passenger for any amount of money, these are experimental tools, not joy rides.
Re:Titanic tourist sub goes missing sparking search by marksmithhfx on Friday June 23, 2023 @03:42PM (#36451343)
There was a distress beacon… it’s called a transponder. It is in a separate pressure chamber controlled by a separate battery. It is a completely separate and isolated system. It failed at the same time as regular comms leading some to conclude the vessel was gone. Kaput. Is no more.
Re:Titanic tourist sub goes missing sparking search by mustacheemperor on Tuesday June 20, 2023 @11:30AM (#36405454)
I think part of the issue there is designing a hatch that can be opened on the surface to exchange air without immediately swamping the sub in the sea chop. Alvin sank very fast when it was accidentally dropped into the water with the hatch open.
Re:Titanic tourist sub goes missing sparking search by actionfromafar on Monday June 19, 2023 @07:26PM (#36397731)
They could get air.