Re:How We Built an iOS App, an Android App and a Node.js API...
by dmix on Monday February 27, 2012 @01:13PM
(#3639919)
I believe the issue people are having with this is that its a bit condescending.
These guys built a mobile app and node API in 20hrs based on something that - they believed - is general common-sense among any city dwellers (avoiding bad neighborhoods).
If you think you know a better way of approaching the problem, then the general response in the hacker community is: build it yourself.
Asking to change wording to something less offensive is fine... but calling them out for not being socially concious and not trying to fix a problem that has affected cities for centuries is a bit of a stretch... especially considering it was a weekend project.
Re:How We Built an iOS App, an Android App and a Node.js API...
by chris_dcosta on Monday February 27, 2012 @12:27PM
(#3639707)
Crikey, a downvote for wanting to make the world a better place? Is that really justified?
Re:How We Built an iOS App, an Android App and a Node.js API...
by jasonlotito on Monday February 27, 2012 @04:58PM
(#3640844)
Wanting something is merely entitlement. Changing something is rewarded. As has been mentioned, if you disagree on the proposed solution to the "problem," a better endeavor would be to change it.
In other words: walk the walk, don't just talk the talk.
Edit: Oh, and complaining about downvotes isn't worthwhile either.
Re:How We Built an iOS App, an Android App and a Node.js API...
by jasonlotito on Monday February 27, 2012 @04:57PM
(#3640843)
Wanting something is merely entitlement. Changing something is rewarded. As has been mentioned, if you disagree on the proposed solution to the "problem," a better endeavor would be to change it.
In other words: walk the walk, don't just talk the talk.
The point I wanted to make was this:
If the app's aim was to draw attention to areas that needed help, for use to focus the minds of governments and aid agencies, and people with a social conscience, and they were using the data to determine the most needy areas in an aggregated fashion it could be positive thing. Where can we help next?
Do you see? This would be making the world a better place.
It is not doing this.
It is basically contributing to the view people from certain areas should be avoided, because statistically speaking they are mostly criminals.
This is not for the good of the many, it's for the good of the one.