Soviet Union sold titanium to US believing they needed it for pizza ovens

Re:Soviet Union sold titanium to US believing they needed it... by TeMPOraL on Monday June 19, 2023 @05:18AM (#36388968)

I call it two extremes because a lot of people insist on viewing them as Completely Different Things. After all, they have opposite names - "right wing" and "left wing". I'm from Europe too, and to me the extremes both look the same. The specific beliefs may be opposite, but that's just a free variable. The intellectual dishonesty, the belligerence, the hatred, they're all the same.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Soviet Union sold titanium to US believing they needed it... by faangsticle on Monday June 19, 2023 @07:57AM (#36390010)

Hate to break it to you but the 2 party system is and has been broken for a very long time. You're choosing between two choices that are mostly identical. Introduce some extra parties if you want healthy politics.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Soviet Union sold titanium to US believing they needed it... by TeMPOraL on Monday June 19, 2023 @08:12AM (#36390158)

I mentioned I'm in/from Europe, not the US, so the 2-party system doesn't really concern me. More importantly though, my comments aren't about the two US parties, but rather the two seemingly opposite extremes of political ideas, that are typically referred to as "left" and "right".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Soviet Union sold titanium to US believing they needed it... by skeeter2020 on Monday June 19, 2023 @08:49AM (#36390478)

While the alternative to a 2 party system may seem obvious, a 2+ party system that's not what you actually get. From a US-type "winner take all" with influential groups & individuals, to preportional representation you end up shifting negotiations into shadowy back rooms amongst unelected officials. In addition, that 3rd option is never coming from the middle. The sizeable movements are even more extreme, pulling the major parties further to some sort of preceived binary position on every topic.

[ Parent | on HN ]