News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:OpenLLM by comfypotato on Monday June 19, 2023 @04:35AM (#36388701)
What exactly do you mean here that the smaller models can compete with the the larger once they are fine-tuned? What about once the larger models are fine-tuned? Are they then out of reach of the fine-tuned smaller models?
Re:OpenLLM by rmbyrro on Monday June 19, 2023 @04:47AM (#36388763)
They're probably referring to fine-tuning on private/proprietary data that is specific to a use case. Say a history of conversation transcripts in a call center.

Larger models, like OpenAI's GPT, don't have access to this by default.

Re:OpenLLM by quickthrower2 on Monday June 19, 2023 @05:13AM (#36388945)
OpenAI’s API has fine tuning options for older GPT models: davinci, curie, babbage, and ada
Re:OpenLLM by kohlerm on Tuesday June 20, 2023 @03:16PM (#36409072)
It doesn't for the newer (relevant) ones. Fine-tuning them is expensive and slow, because they are large
Re:OpenLLM by chaoyu on Monday June 19, 2023 @04:51AM (#36388793)
Smaller models are likely more efficient to run inference and doesn't necessarily need the latest GPU. Larger language model trend to have better performance over more different type of tasks. But for a specific enterprise use case, either distilling a large model or use large model to help with training a smaller model can be quite helpful in getting things to production - where you may need cost-efficiency and lower latency.