News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bullshit Jobs by David Graeber (2018) by goodpoint on Saturday June 17, 2023 @04:29PM (#36374239)
Cowen's review is very poor. Graeber famously interviewed a lot of people and they described their own jobs as bullshit and explained why.

Graeber's work might be opinionated but his evidence is stronger than Cowen's flippant comeback.

>> At that point we’ll see who really has the bullshit job.

This almost reads as Cowen is claiming that Graeber's job is bullshit.

Graeber is a prize winning and successful writer and academic.

Re:Bullshit Jobs by David Graeber (2018) by unmole on Sunday June 18, 2023 @01:36AM (#36377610)
Graeber was a successful bullshit artist. Sure, he doesn't have a bullshit job according to his vague and peculiar definition. But this was a man who wrote a door stopper of a book on Debt which blitley conflates credit with benevolence.
Re:Bullshit Jobs by David Graeber (2018) by zeroonetwothree on Sunday June 18, 2023 @10:49AM (#36380776)
I don’t think winning prizes that academics themselves create is proof that the academic jobs are valuable. Of course we could say the same thing about Tyler.
Re:Bullshit Jobs by David Graeber (2018) by goodpoint on Sunday June 18, 2023 @02:01PM (#36382627)
With enough mental gymnastic you can say that.